Monday, 6 July 2015

Day 357, Are we being fooled in choosing staged oppositions?



Within this blog, I am going to talk about something that has grabbed my attention.
I am seeing through the news and media that we are being led to believe that there is this imminent threat going on between Russia and United States of America. And little by little a scenario is being created that makes people choose either to support Russia or to support U.S.A.

When one watches the news, even the so-called: "alternatives News," if one pays attention, one will notice that more and more the West is putting President Putin in the light as the one who is the boogy-man and the one that is the big scare. And President Putin is playing the role of the guy who stands tall against the West. The West being mainly some countries in Europe and the U.S.A. They're throwing sanctions after sanctions against one another, and who gets hurt in all of this none sense, the populations, not these leaders themselves.
Little by little if one notice too, there are people starting to cheer up and support more and more President Putin, and Obama on the other hand is being seen as the bully that act as if he wants diplomacy, but yet is hungry to start a war. Naval ships are surrounding Russia, threatening Russia. Now all this is being played in the media as America and allies are threatening Russia and not the other way around, which makes more and more people standing behind President Putin, thus making people choose sides. Then we have this whole BRICS thing going on, which is nothing but the world bank in another suit, because they are STILL using the methodology of issuing money as DEBT. 

Now here is my take; 'I do not buy into none of that.'  I find all of that is staged strategy, to measure people's  reactions and in order to see if they will accept yet another war and which side are they going to be on. Yet the leaders themselves whom are playing this staged enemies of one another, are not going to be the ones going to war, nor will they be the ones dying in the war, they will hide in their special bunkers if it comes that far.

Now I am going to tell you the reader, the WHY I find this all to be staged.

Have you heard of the Antarctic Treaty? You should, if you haven't. Because apparently " down there" at the South Pole, these countries that are enemies with one another through the media and news, are very good friends, so good that they will work together to preserve this South Pole, militarily. Now does this makes sense to you?  On one side of the so-called: " globe," they are enemies and on the another side they are friends. On one side they are preserving resources and having very high regards for the environment but yet on the other side they will go to war for resources and don't actually give a damn about the environment. So how can they come to an agreement down there and up here, they seemingly can't? What is so special down there that they are willing to even work together to preserve it and protect it against all odds?


Down here I will place a video of a man whom was in the U.S.A military and I need you to pay attention to what he is saying. Admiral Richard E. Byrd.  And never mind the conspiracy about the "Hollow Earth" theory and aliens in the video after the piece of the Admiral talking on the show. At that time the government was VERY interested in the great reservoir of natural resources that is in and on the South Pole.


                        




So whatever you may hear of Russia and America going to war or avoiding to go to war depending which leader you choose, I need you to remember that at the South Pole/ Antarctica they are friends, and one thing is certain, you cannot be friends here and not friends there. Whatever they are pulling on the North side of the "globe" is in actuality a movement to protect whatever it is that is so important and highly valuable down there. So don't be fooled to accept yet another war, where you will be killed/murdered from either side. Keep on investigating all things even the things that seemingly sounds like crazy so to speak.


Now I want you to pay attention to the list of countries that have a saying in the decision making in this Treaty.

Parties

The original Signatories to the Treaty are the twelve countries that were active in Antarctica during the International Geophysical Year of 1957-58 and then accepted the invitation of the Government of the United States of America to participate in the diplomatic conference at which the Treaty was negotiated in Washington in 1959. These Parties have the right to participate in the meetings provided for in Article IX of the Treaty (Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meetings, ATCM).
Since 1959, thirty-eight other countries have acceded to the Treaty. According to Art. IX.2, they are entitled to participate in the Consultative Meetings during such times as they demonstrate their interest in Antarctica by “conducting substantial research activity there” . Seventeen of the acceding countries have had their activities in Antarctica recognized according to this provision, and consequently there are now twenty-nine Consultative Parties in all. The other twenty-one Non-Consultative Parties are invited to attend the Consultative Meetings but do not participate in the decision-making.

Consultative
Country
Entry into force 1
Consultative status2
Environment Protocol 3
CCAS 4
CCAMLR
Web Site 5
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/flags/1.gif  Argentina
23 Jun 1961
23 Jun 1961*
14 Jan 1998
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
Web Site
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/flags/2.gif  Australia
23 Jun 1961
23 Jun 1961*
14 Jan 1998
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
Web Site
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/flags/4.gif  Belgium
23 Jun 1961
23 Jun 1961*
14 Jan 1998
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
Web Site
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/flags/5.gif  Brazil
16 May 1975
27 Sep 1983
14 Jan 1998
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
Web Site
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/flags/6.gif  Bulgaria
11 Sep 1978
05 Jun 1998
21 May 1998
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
Web Site
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/flags/8.gif  Chile
23 Jun 1961
23 Jun 1961*
14 Jan 1998
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
Web Site
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/flags/9.gif  China
08 Jun 1983
07 Oct 1985
14 Jan 1998
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
Web Site
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/flags/12.gif  Czech Republic
14 Jun 1962
01 Apr 2014
24 Sep 2004
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/flags/14.gif  Ecuador
15 Sep 1987
19 Nov 1990
14 Jan 1998
Web Site
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/flags/15.gif  Finland
15 May 1984
20 Oct 1989
14 Jan 1998
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
Web Site
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/flags/16.gif  France
23 Jun 1961
23 Jun 1961*
14 Jan 1998
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
Web Site
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/flags/17.gif  Germany
05 Feb 1979
03 Mar 1981
14 Jan 1998
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
Web Site
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/flags/21.gif  India
19 Aug 1983
12 Sep 1983
14 Jan 1998
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
Web Site
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/flags/22.gif  Italy
18 Mar 1981
05 Oct 1987
14 Jan 1998
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
Web Site
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/flags/23.gif  Japan
23 Jun 1961
23 Jun 1961*
14 Jan 1998
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
Web Site
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/flags/25.gif  Korea (ROK)
28 Nov 1986
09 Oct 1989
14 Jan 1998
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
Web Site
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/flags/26.gif  Netherlands
30 Mar 1967
19 Nov 1990
14 Jan 1998
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
Web Site
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/flags/27.gif  New Zealand
23 Jun 1961
23 Jun 1961*
14 Jan 1998
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
Web Site
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/flags/28.gif  Norway
23 Jun 1961
23 Jun 1961*
14 Jan 1998
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
Web Site
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/flags/30.gif  Peru
10 Apr 1981
09 Oct 1989
14 Jan 1998
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
Web Site
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/flags/31.gif  Poland
23 Jun 1961
29 Jul 1977
14 Jan 1998
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
Web Site
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/flags/33.gif  Russian Federation
23 Jun 1961
23 Jun 1961*
14 Jan 1998
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
Web Site
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/flags/35.gif  South Africa
23 Jun 1961
23 Jun 1961*
14 Jan 1998
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
Web Site
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/flags/36.gif  Spain
31 Mar 1982
21 Sep 1988
14 Jan 1998
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
Web Site
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/flags/37.gif  Sweden
24 Apr 1984
21 Sep 1988
14 Jan 1998
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
Web Site
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/flags/40.gif  Ukraine
28 Oct 1992
04 Jun 2004
24 Jun 2001
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
Web Site
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/flags/41.gif  United Kingdom
23 Jun 1961
23 Jun 1961*
14 Jan 1998
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
Web Site
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/flags/42.gif  United States
23 Jun 1961
23 Jun 1961*
14 Jan 1998
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
Web Site
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/flags/43.gif  Uruguay
11 Jan 1980
07 Oct 1985
14 Jan 1998
http://www.ats.aq/devAS/images/icon_accept.gif
Web Site


So as one can see, the  countries that formed the BRICS banks of international settlements  are all here on this list. Now understand that in most of these countries they are having lots of problems economically, however yet, here they are working together to preserve and protect an area full of natural resources. Does all of this makes sense to you the reader?  Because lots of these countries on the other side of the "globe" are doing lots of manoeuvres to get  their hands on some resources in order to make some money, however down there they are all very well behaved and even work together to preserve the natural resources. 
so why would one be greedy on one side and very much equal on another side?

So I leave you with these questions and to remember to not just go for whatever is in the news that seem like  a big thing, but continue asking questions and you will find answers. Because this point is a very good question and as you have noticed no-one talks about it at all, no news is covering this, not even the so-called: "Alternative News."
Remember; ' investigate all things and keep that which is good,' is the principle here.


Thanks,

Larry Manuela



Join us at: Desteni

Have a look at Equalmoney the solution to all the problems in this world.


Support our research and buy one or more products that will assist and support you greatly in understanding what is actually going on in life, through;  EQAFE

And do the life course and perfect yourself: DIP

Study this  proposal which is:  LIG


Sources:   http://www.ats.aq/index_e.htm

                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tzWHqooAJtM